Enzymes

Students started off the topic on enzymes with an experiment of yeast and hydrogen peroxide, but without knowing the contents of the experiment.

The enzyme catalayse in yeast cells catalysed the breakdown of hydrogen peroxide into water and oxygen gas, resulting in bubbles formed. Students were allowed to smell and hold the test-tube, and using their observations, they were asked to provide a hypothesis of the contents in the test-tube.

Natural Resources

Jaslynn kick-started the inquiry with the statement below. Excitedly, students began to throw out examples of resources, some mentioning the idea of deforestation.

In the past 50 years, humans have consumed more resources than in all previous history.”

“What’s so wrong about cutting down trees?” Jaslynn asked. Ideas surfaced included having lesser trees to photosynthesize to construction of buildings where trees used to stand.

At this point, Jaslynn introduced a video reflecting Man’s impact on the environment over the lifetime of mankind.

Adaptations

Hazel showed her class a video clip on flying fish in the wild, and how they escaped from their predators.

After the video clip, she started the discussion in KF with the following question: Putting our knowledge together - What did you learn from the video?

Another teacher, Irene, showed a video clip on different kinds of wildlife in Singapore. She then proceeded to ask them to think about the features of the animals shown to them that would help them adapt to their environment for survival.

Matter

Gerlynn got students to classify items into three categories: matter, non-matter and not sure. She then asked them why they categorised some items as matter and not others.

Their initial theories of matter were:

  • “matter is anything that has mass and occupies space” (definition from the textbook)
  • “matter is something that you can touch and see”
  • “matter has weight”
  • “you can see the three types of matter, solid, liquid and gas”

Materials

Elizabeth and Fadil split the students into groups and gave them various objects to classify. The students were encouraged to come to a consensus as a group, and if there were other individual alternative views, to put those on hold.

The classification was varied, with some classifying according to the materials used while others classified according to the function of the objects (e.g.: household item, cutlery)

Fire

After going through the school’s slides and content coverage for the topic, both Angela and Beth set their students out to complete group compositions.

Under the voting scaffold ‘I chose this because’, students were to read all the groups’ compositions and post a note on the view of the group composition which they liked the best. They were also prompted to state their reasons for their choice, as well as to quote phrases from the original piece to support their stand.